WHY I DON’T MIND USING ‘LEARNER’ UNTIL A BETTER WORD COMES ALONG

L&D has long had a history of coming up with solutions that fall woefully short of achieving our goals. But changing a word in order to make up for a shortcoming in the way we do our work is not the answer. Instead, I strongly suggest that we focus on improving our solutions by using thoughtful strategies and approaches. Here are some counter arguments for the proposal to stop using the word ‘learner’.

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

We all have a pedant inside of us. While we ourselves may not find the most suitable words to use on every occasion, we take pleasure in pointing out the nitty-gritty of mistakes made by someone else.

At least, that’s very true of me. And as I’m writing this, I can almost hear the collective groan from my family as I pointed out the 23 mistakes in a written recipe that was shared in our WhatsApp group.

What I am trying to say is that when someone questions a word or phrase that’s been in common use, I tend to jump right in and join the questioning brigade.

But, not so in this case.

A recent topic that has come up on social media – LinkedIn, primarily – is that we shouldn’t refer to our audience (the recipients of our content) as learners. Here are the arguments for changing it:

  • They are humans, or just people, not learners.
  • Learning is not something that you can do to someone. It’s something that they need to take upon, and do for, themselves.
  • We’re assuming active participation on the part of the audience where none probably exists.
  • They are learning all the time, not just when they are participating in your solution.
  • The term is used only in L&D; not anywhere else.

And here are some alternatives suggested for the word learner:

  • Audience
  • Participant
  • Trainee  
  • Consumer
  • Employee

While the sentiments listed above are all valid, I would argue that none of the suggested alternatives capture the essence of what we’re trying to do. Here are my counter arguments:

They are humans, or just people, and not learners.

If this thought is coming from a place of saying that we are catering to real humans, and not just a cohort of nameless creatures called ‘learners’, I completely agree.

Like everyone else, they have their motivations and challenges, and we absolutely need to take them into account while designing solutions. That’s our job.

But then, every profession uses a word to describe the recipient of their services. There are readers for newspapers, guests in hotels, patients in the medical field, passengers in travel, and so on. So why shouldn’t we use a special term (a really appropriate one) to refer to the beneficiaries of our work?

Learning is not something that you can do to someone. It’s something that they need to take upon, and do for, themselves.

Once again, I agree. However, isn’t that what we’re aspiring for?

We’re not aiming for a simple transfer of information. Instead, we are putting our heart and soul into shifting perspectives, leading to an improvement in skill, or a change in behaviors and attitudes. Why, then, shouldn’t we deny ourselves the pleasure of calling learners by the name they truly deserve to be addressed by?

We’re assuming active participation on the part of the audience where none probably exists.

My answer here is the same as above. We WANT learners to actively participate in the learning process. The fact that they aren’t currently doing so points to a shortcoming in the solution, not that the name learner has to be changed.

They are learning all the time, not just when they are participating in your solution.

Absolutely! All the more reason to call them learners. Isn’t it?

The term is used only in L&D; not anywhere else.

For the fifth time, I agree.

Nearly every profession has terms that are not necessarily used with the customers of that profession. Or even those that are on the periphery of that profession.

For instance, the terms used by two doctors to discuss a patient’s condition may not be used while communicating with the patient or their relatives. Or even with non-medical staff in the hospital.

Similarly, while we need to be aware that this word is neither used nor recognized outside L&D, I don’t see why it should be changed internally, within the context of L&D.

Now let’s look at the alternatives proposed:

  • Audience, participant, trainee and consumer are too passive. We want people to engage with the learning, partake in it, benefit from it, and see a positive change because of it. None of these terms do justice to such an involved pursuit of learning.
  • Employee is too generic. It’s something similar to human, or just person or people. Yes, they are employees and they are humans, but they have a specific role to play in this context, which is to learn. So why not use that?

I agree that sometimes our solutions fall woefully short of achieving our goals. But changing a word in order to make up for a shortcoming in the way we do our work is not the answer! Instead, I strongly suggest that we focus on improving our solutions by using thoughtful strategies and approaches.

Unless of course, a better word comes along.

In which case I’ll be very happy to shift.


Written by Srividya Kumar, Co-Founder @ Learnnovators

(Visited 401 times, 1 visits today)

More To Explore

Creating a Sense of Belonging in Remote Work Environments - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Creating a Sense of Belonging in Remote Work Environments

Remote work comes with plenty of perks, but it can also leave people feeling disconnected. This blog dives into five straightforward ways to create a stronger sense of belonging across remote teams. From taking time for real conversations and celebrating everyday wins to encouraging openness and involving everyone in decisions, it’s about making the small things count. Because when people aren’t in the same room, connection takes intention—and a little thought can go a long way in building a team that feels truly supported.

How to Cultivate Resilience in the Workplace
E-Learning

How to Cultivate Resilience in the Workplace

Resilience at work isn’t just about getting through tough times—it’s about learning, growing, and coming out stronger. This blog looks at simple, practical ways to build resilience across your team, from creating a safe, supportive environment to encouraging real connections and open conversations. It also highlights the importance of recognizing growth, even when things don’t go as planned. When resilience becomes part of everyday culture, teams are better prepared to handle whatever comes their way—and keep moving forward.

Empowering Teams Through Trust and Transparency - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Empowering Teams Through Trust and Transparency

Empowering teams starts with a culture built on trust and transparency—not just as ideals, but as daily practices. When people feel trusted and have access to open, honest communication, they’re more likely to take initiative, collaborate, and innovate. This blog explores how trust fosters psychological safety, while transparency enables confident decision-making. Together, they lay the foundation for accountability, creativity, and resilience. Through consistent communication, authentic leadership, and shared purpose, organizations can create a workplace where people feel truly empowered to contribute and grow.

Leading by Example: Why Actions Speak Louder Than Words in Leadership - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Leading by Example: Why Actions Speak Louder Than Words in Leadership

Leadership isn’t about commanding excellence—it’s about demonstrating it. This blog explores why actions speak louder than words, showing how leading by example builds trust, drives accountability, and inspires stronger performance. From seeking feedback regularly—and acting upon it—to promoting work-life balance, it highlights practical ways leaders can shape team culture through consistent, value-driven actions. When leaders walk the talk, they don’t just influence outcomes—they shape mindsets, proving that true leadership is practiced, not proclaimed.

The Impact of Psychological Safety at the Workplace
E-Learning

The Impact of Psychological Safety at the Workplace

Psychological safety is the quiet engine behind strong, high-performing teams. When people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and admit mistakes without fear of judgment, collaboration thrives and innovation flows more freely. This blog explores how creating a culture of openness—especially in remote and hybrid settings—can lead to faster problem-solving, more learning moments, and deeper team connections. With small, intentional actions, leaders can build a workplace where every voice is valued and growth becomes a shared journey.

E-Learning

Why Humility is a Strength in Leadership

Great leadership isn’t about always having the right answers—it’s about building trust and earning respect. Humility is a powerful but often overlooked trait that strengthens relationships, encourages learning, and promotes teamwork. Humble leaders build credibility by valuing diverse perspectives, sharing credit, and owning their mistakes. By creating an environment where employees feel heard and empowered, they drive innovation and long-term success. Embracing humility doesn’t diminish authority; it enhances leadership effectiveness, making teams more engaged and organizations more resilient. In a world that values confidence, humility stands out as a true leadership superpower.

REQUEST DEMO