THE CASE FOR CLARITY IN L&D JOB POSTINGS

This article argues for the importance of distinguishing between generalist and specialist L&D roles in job postings. This will help candidates better understand what they're applying for and to attract the right candidates with the right skills and experience.

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

Instructional design is a multifaceted field that requires a range of skills and expertise. There’s no denying that.

However, a recent job posting for an instructional designer that caught my attention read something on the lines of:

  • Has the ability to create instructional materials that follow sound instructional design principles and learning theories.
  • Demonstrates proficiency in learning and adapting to new software applications and technologies.
  • Has an eye for spotting the best of resources on any given topic from a vast array of available information.
  • Is proficient in using e-learning authoring tools like Articulate Storyline and Rise.
  • Is comfortable using the latest graphic design and animation tools.
  • Possesses knowledge and experience in data management and learning analytics.
  • Has experience working with and administering a range of Learning Management Systems.
  • Experience working with external partners and vendors would be an added bonus.

Contrast this with another job posting that read as follows:

  • Work with leaders and experts to make effective training materials for classes, workshops, online learning, etc.
  • Collaborate with the business to set clear learning goals that help the company achieve its objectives, and come up with ways to measure how well they work.
  • Create fun, engaging, and easy-to-follow learning materials that use the latest research and design principles.
  • Use your writing and teaching skills to explain complicated ideas in a way that anyone can understand.
  • Keep track of all the materials in our system and make sure they’re organized and easy to find.
  • Make a system for getting feedback on our training and then work on making it better.
  • Teach classes when you need to and help other people do the same.

Both of these job postings call for instructional designers with a few years of experience. But do you notice the difference between the two?

The second job posting is focused on the skills and expertise of an instructional designer doing core design work, with a bit of analysis and consulting thrown in.

The first one, on the other hand, combines the jobs of an instructional designer, a curator, a graphic designer, an e-learning developer, a data analyst and an LMS administrator all rolled into one. Not to mention being a consultant to the business and being a leader and vendor manager too. Here’s the first posting again, with the key phrases highlighted:

  • Has the ability to create instructional materials that follow sound instructional design principles and learning theories.
  • Demonstrates proficiency in learning and adapting to new software applications and technologies.
  • Has an eye for spotting the best of resources on any given topic from a vast array of available information.
  • Is proficient in using e-learning authoring tools like Articulate Storyline and Rise.
  • Is comfortable using the latest graphic design and animation tools.
  • Possesses knowledge and experience in data management and learning analytics.
  • Has experience working with and administering a range of Learning Management Systems.
  • Experience working with external partners and vendors would be an added bonus.

This is not a one-off case. I keep seeing such jobs being posted regularly. Some even require project management and facilitation expertise in addition to a combination of the skills listed above.

I understand why companies do this. If an organization has a small L&D team, then it probably makes sense to want all team members to be proficient in all areas. However, the challenge is that by just seeing the job title, there is no way to guess what the role is going to entail.

One simple solution could be to specify whether the role is that of a generalist or a specialist directly in the job title. This approach is not new – other professions have been doing it for years.

Take HR for example. In the HR world, job titles often include words like “generalist” or “specialist” to make it clear what the position calls for. An HR Generalist is someone who handles a wide range of HR responsibilities, while a specialist typically focuses on one specific area of expertise, such as recruitment, benefits, or compensation. This way, job seekers know exactly what they’re applying for, and companies can attract the right candidates for the job.

Another example is the medical field. Doctors are generally either general practitioners or specialists. I could go on drawing examples from other industries and professions, but you get the idea.

In the L&D world, a generalist might handle a broad range of responsibilities, such as needs assessments, program design, and evaluation, while a specialist might focus on a particular area, such as e-learning development or instructional design. By including these terms in the job title, companies can avoid confusion and attract candidates with the right skills and experience.

Of course, not every L&D job fits neatly into a generalist or specialist category. Some roles may require a mix of both, or may have unique responsibilities that require a different job title altogether. But for those jobs where the distinction is clear, using the terms “Generalist” or “Specialist” in the job title can be a smart move.

In conclusion, by taking a page from other professions that use specific words in their job titles, L&D hiring managers can make their roles clearer and more attractive to the right candidates. So why not give it a try?

Your L&D team (and your future employees) will thank you.


Written by Srividya Kumar, Co-Founder @ Learnnovators

(Visited 500 times, 1 visits today)

More To Explore

The Power of a Good Start - Why Onboarding Matters - Learnnovators
E-Learning

The Power of a Good Start: Why Onboarding Matters

The first few days in a new role can set the tone for everything that follows. This article explores why onboarding is more than just paperwork and process—it’s about helping people feel grounded, supported, and ready to contribute. When onboarding is thoughtful and human, it gives new joiners the clarity and confidence they need to hit the ground running. Because a good start doesn’t just ease the transition – it lays the foundation for long-term engagement and growth.

Upskilling and Reskilling - Thumbnail
E-Learning

Navigating Change: Upskill or Reskill?

As technology continues to reshape industries, organisations face a critical question: should they upskill their teams – or reskill them entirely? This article breaks down the difference between the two, explores when and why each approach makes sense, and highlights how aligning employee growth with business goals can lead to long-term success. Whether it’s helping people sharpen existing skills or preparing them for entirely new roles, the key lies in building a culture of continuous learning that’s ready for whatever comes next.

Learning Culture vs. Training Culture - Thumbnail - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Learning Culture vs Training Culture

Many workplaces still treat learning as a one-off task—something to tick off after a course or compliance module. But real growth doesn’t happen in isolated sessions. This article unpacks the key difference between a training culture and a learning culture—and why it matters. While one ends with the session, the other is woven into everyday work, conversations, and challenges. The piece offers a clear perspective on how organisations can move beyond checklists and create an environment where learning is ongoing, meaningful, and part of the culture.

Corporate Culture - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Corporate Culture vs. Company Values

It’s easy to print your values on posters. It’s much harder to live by them every day. This article unpacks the growing disconnect between company values and actual workplace culture – and why that gap matters. It explores how culture isn’t built on buzzwords but on behaviours, decisions, and what leaders choose to reward. When values are lived, they create trust and meaning. When they aren’t backed by action, people notice. The piece offers practical ways to close the gap and build a culture that not only says the right things, but does them too.

Micromanaging - Blog - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Stop Micromanaging. Start Trusting.

Micromanaging rarely starts with bad intentions—but it can quietly erode trust, stifle creativity, and drain ownership from even the most capable teams. In remote settings, where reassurance can’t come from a smile or a quick hallway chat, the impact runs deeper. This piece unpacks how micromanagement shows up, why it’s often invisible to the manager, and what it really takes to build a culture of trust. Because real support isn’t about control—it’s about creating space for people to take the lead, make mistakes, and grow.

How to Develop and Retain a Highly Engaged Workforce - Learnnovators
E-Learning

How to Develop and Retain a Highly Engaged Workforce

Engagement isn’t about grand gestures—it’s about getting the everyday things right. This article breaks down what it really takes to build and keep a workforce that’s motivated, committed, and ready to grow with the company. From meaningful onboarding and recognition to encouraging autonomy and psychological safety, it’s a practical look at how small, thoughtful efforts can add up to a culture people want to be part of—not just today, but for the long haul.

REQUEST DEMO