LEARNER ENGAGEMENT – IT’S NOT WHAT YOU THINK

This article delves into the misconceptions surrounding the term "learner engagement". It differentiates between the shallow engagement brought about by empty interactivity and visuals (behavioral engagement) and the deeper engagement sought after by instructional designers (emotional and cognitive engagement).

Share This Post

Share on facebook
Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on email

I’ve always been fascinated with the idea of learner engagement.

And rightly so.

If you do anything remotely connected with instructional design, you would be too.

Because it’s engagement that opens up the gates to learner involvement in the course. It gets them committed to the outcomes, and then makes them work hard towards ‘getting there’.

But unfortunately today, the term learner engagement gets bandied about meaninglessly. Or at least, I get the feeling that people (a.k.a., instructional designers) don’t really understand why engagement is important, or how to focus on the right kind of engagement. I’ve written about it here.

So, here I am with a clarification, and an example.

Let’s start off by talking about who is an engaged learner.

An engaged learner is one who believes that it is truly important to them to learn the concerned topic. In other words, they are sold on the subject of the course, and therefore, are wholeheartedly invested in the learning process. They are excited and motivated by what the course has to offer, and are willing to put in the effort to make their learning experience a successful one.

How about a course that offers lots of interactivity and stunning visuals? Are learners engaged when participating in such a course?

Maybe they are. Maybe they aren’t. It depends on a couple of factors, at least.

  • Is the interactivity supporting a real-world scenario that makes learners think hard before selecting an answer? If yes, then they’re engaged. If it is simply making them click a lot, then they’re probably not.
  • Are the visuals augmenting the content in a way that they help make a point or elaborate a concept? If yes, then they are engaging. If the visuals exist only because they look good, they aren’t.

The kind of engagement brought about by a lot of empty interactivity and visuals is referred to as behavioral engagement. This, according to experts, is the shallowest kind of engagement. And as designers, we want to move away from this.

On the other hand, there are two kinds of engagement we want to seek out and incorporate in our courses. These are…

Emotional Engagement

This involves helping learners understand why they should care for the topic. In quintessential marketing terminology, it is the What’s In It For Me (or WIIFM).

While the WIIFM pulls learners into the course, there are other elements within the course that should keep learners engaged, or in other words, interested in the topic. This can be brought about by storytelling or other emotional factors, such as using examples and scenarios that are relatable and personal.

For example, if a scenario is about a challenge that the learner faces on the job regularly, then they are immediately drawn in and engaged.

Cognitive Engagement

This is the kind of engagement that requires mental effort on the part of the learner.

While there are many ways to bring about cognitive engagement, the most common, and perhaps the most impactful, is practice scenarios.

The practice needs to be:

  • Meaningful (as in, closely related to their workplace context), and
  • Effortful (it should get them to think hard and make decisions, similar to how they would in their workplace)

Also, the practice should invoke the right level of effort. Too hard, and it can lead to frustration and the learner giving up too soon. Too easy, and it can lead to boredom, and once again, the learner giving up too soon.

Meanwhile, here is an example that will help you think about the different kinds of engagement. Read the question and try to respond in your mind before checking out the answer.

Question:

You are midway through the design of an e-learning program, and your client suggests adding points to make it gamified, and to spice up the experience of the course. What kind of engagement would this be? And would it add value to the learner and engage them at a deeper level?

Answer:

Behavioral engagement. While gamification is a good learning strategy, adding it as an afterthought is not likely to engage learners at a deeper level. If you do want to make these points valuable as an engagement tool, ask yourself the following:

  • Do the points lead to something? In other words, what would learners do with the points they’ve earned? If your answer is ‘nothing’, then it’s straight away a bad idea to include them in your course.
  • Are the points supportive of the remaining elements in the course? If yes, keep them, and if not, discard them.

Behavioral engagement, in the form of empty interactions, gamification, catchy visuals etc., might have a value of its own, but in most cases, it can be detrimental to the deeper engagement that we’re looking for. Check out our follow-up posts on the ways we can bring about emotional and cognitive engagement.


Written by Srividya Kumar, Co-Founder @ Learnnovators

(Visited 313 times, 1 visits today)

More To Explore

The Power of a Good Start - Why Onboarding Matters - Learnnovators
E-Learning

The Power of a Good Start: Why Onboarding Matters

The first few days in a new role can set the tone for everything that follows. This article explores why onboarding is more than just paperwork and process—it’s about helping people feel grounded, supported, and ready to contribute. When onboarding is thoughtful and human, it gives new joiners the clarity and confidence they need to hit the ground running. Because a good start doesn’t just ease the transition – it lays the foundation for long-term engagement and growth.

Upskilling and Reskilling - Thumbnail
E-Learning

Navigating Change: Upskill or Reskill?

As technology continues to reshape industries, organisations face a critical question: should they upskill their teams – or reskill them entirely? This article breaks down the difference between the two, explores when and why each approach makes sense, and highlights how aligning employee growth with business goals can lead to long-term success. Whether it’s helping people sharpen existing skills or preparing them for entirely new roles, the key lies in building a culture of continuous learning that’s ready for whatever comes next.

Learning Culture vs. Training Culture - Thumbnail - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Learning Culture vs Training Culture

Many workplaces still treat learning as a one-off task—something to tick off after a course or compliance module. But real growth doesn’t happen in isolated sessions. This article unpacks the key difference between a training culture and a learning culture—and why it matters. While one ends with the session, the other is woven into everyday work, conversations, and challenges. The piece offers a clear perspective on how organisations can move beyond checklists and create an environment where learning is ongoing, meaningful, and part of the culture.

Corporate Culture - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Corporate Culture vs. Company Values

It’s easy to print your values on posters. It’s much harder to live by them every day. This article unpacks the growing disconnect between company values and actual workplace culture – and why that gap matters. It explores how culture isn’t built on buzzwords but on behaviours, decisions, and what leaders choose to reward. When values are lived, they create trust and meaning. When they aren’t backed by action, people notice. The piece offers practical ways to close the gap and build a culture that not only says the right things, but does them too.

Micromanaging - Blog - Learnnovators
E-Learning

Stop Micromanaging. Start Trusting.

Micromanaging rarely starts with bad intentions—but it can quietly erode trust, stifle creativity, and drain ownership from even the most capable teams. In remote settings, where reassurance can’t come from a smile or a quick hallway chat, the impact runs deeper. This piece unpacks how micromanagement shows up, why it’s often invisible to the manager, and what it really takes to build a culture of trust. Because real support isn’t about control—it’s about creating space for people to take the lead, make mistakes, and grow.

How to Develop and Retain a Highly Engaged Workforce - Learnnovators
E-Learning

How to Develop and Retain a Highly Engaged Workforce

Engagement isn’t about grand gestures—it’s about getting the everyday things right. This article breaks down what it really takes to build and keep a workforce that’s motivated, committed, and ready to grow with the company. From meaningful onboarding and recognition to encouraging autonomy and psychological safety, it’s a practical look at how small, thoughtful efforts can add up to a culture people want to be part of—not just today, but for the long haul.

REQUEST DEMO