An active, intellectually engaged culture matters because it contributes directly to the bottom-line, to expertise generated within the organization and so on.
This time I’d like to focus on the choices that we in L&D make, that have the effect of cueing people to be intellectually passive.
Is learning amoral, absolutely removed from all ethical concerns? From the curricular choices an organization makes, to the expectations it sets for employee knowledge and expertise, there should be consonance with the overall ethical identity of the organization, because all of these actions have an ethical dimension.
“The days of looking for people with “deep levels of experience” are over – now we have to look for people with skills, ambition, and the ability to learn.”
An excerpt from this blog post by Josh Bersin, Global Industry Analyst and CEO of The Josh Bersin Company
We, at Learnnovators, are immensely pleased to announce that we’ve bagged four awards at LearnX 2018… and all the more delighted since we’ve won awards in all the four categories that we participated in.
While the title of the post specifies MOOCs, the skills and mindsets
The world has gotten complicated. Organizations are struggling to keep up with the shifts
IMHO, a MOOC is an evolving and dynamic learning and collaboration
describes MOOCs thus in her Master’s Thesis: “MOOC is above all referring to a pedagogical model
MOOCs – you can love them or hate them but you can definitely not ignore them.
i’m arguing that something much bigger is happening than the application collaborative tools
I have been writing about social learning and its related concepts
Recently, I read two posts that to me reflected the changing nature of work
